The Weaponisation of Cancer in the War on Food and Health

For the longest time cancer was known as a mysteriously occurring and utterly destructive illness, so much so that having cancer is seen as synonymous to death. This narrative was accompanied by the sensationalisation of chemotherapy as a remedy for cancer, however utterly destructive and experimental the radiation may be. Well, the status quo and history reveal that cancer is anything but mysteriously occuring, it is an intentionally curated weapon in the war on human health and food, which is precisely what we’ll address today.
THE WAR ON HEALTH AND THE COMMERCIALISATION OF CANCER
And now onto our main discussion on the weaponisation of cancer, and we ought to ask: if cancer is not a mysterious corruption of the human cells, what then is it? Emphatically, cancer is a man-made weapon against the human body (much like viruses). And not only is cancer man-made, but it is also big business, a multi-billion dollar industry. It involves getting people to get cancer, to be poisoned with chemotherapy, and large amounts of money spent on continuous research for a cure that apparently does not exist (which is a lie).
And the biggest proof of this intentional weaponisation and commercialisation of cancer is that, simply put, cancer did NOT really exist more than 50 years ago but started booming with the introduction of processed food loaded with massive amounts of sugar and chemicals. Furthermore, in contrast with the reported prevalence of cancer today (with it reported to be the cause of death in one of eight cases in 2004) scientists, HOWEVER, have only found one case of cancer in investigations of hundreds of Egyptian mummies, as was reported by researcher Rosalie David at the University of Manchester in England. Well, this rarity of cancer in mummies suggests it was scarce in antiquity, and “that cancer-causing factors are limited to societies affected by modern industrialisation; AND in an ancient society lacking surgical intervention, evidence of cancer should remain in all cases – in fact, this was echoed by researcher Michael Zimmerman at Villanova University in Pennsylvania. Therefore, there must be notable inventions or developments in modern day society that have led to the growth in cancer cases (such as chemicals and artificial foods) – bringing us to where we started, which is that cancer is man-made and is big business.
THE RISE IN GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER CANCERS, IN RELATION TO DETRIMENTAL CHEMICALS IN FOOD
Food is a big discussion point when it comes to cancer, especially when looking at the rise in gastro-intestinal (or GI) cancer. So, when we look at colorectal cancer, esophagus cancer, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, liver cancer, stomach cancer, and even pancreatic cancer – what all of these cancers have in common is that they are all part the gastrointestinal tract.
Immediately, this means that not only is there a problem with cancer, but there is an urgent need to look at what people are consuming in order to address the problem; especially when considering that, in the US, where this is a serious problem, 70% of the average American’s diet consists of eating ultra-processed foods.
ONE OF THE LEADING CAUSES OF CANCER IS EXPOSURE TO CARCINOGENIC SYSTEMS
This brings us to a discussion on the leading causes of cancer. Of course, you have already heard the President of Loveworld Incorporated, the highly esteemed Rev. Dr Chris Oyakhilome DSc. DSc. DD. warn about the artificial and genetically modified food that causes cancer. Well, another crucial cause is exposure to carcinogenic systems. Now, a carcinogen is any substance, agent, or process that can induce cancer. They can cause cancer by damaging DNA or interfering with cellular processes (hence cancer is known as an attack on healthy cells by a cancerous cell). Examples of these carcinogens include asbestos, benzene, radon and even tobacco smoke.
This is critical to note because it exposes a detrimental irony when it comes to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is also a carcinogenic system! It is inherently a harmful concoction of chemicals that was initially created as a weapon, and then suddenly became rebranded as a health intervention.
CHEMOTHERAPY IS (IRONICALLY) A CARCINOGEN
There you have it, this same chemical agent that was used to kill people is now being used to allegedly treat cancer. And ironically, despite the modifications on it, chemotherapy can also function as a carcinogen! More specifically, chemotherapy drugs are designed to target and destroy rapidly dividing cells, including cancer cells, but they can also affect healthy cells that divide quickly, like those in the bone marrow, hair follicles, and digestive tract. However, some chemotherapy agents, particularly alkylating agents, have been linked to an increased risk of developing certain types of leukemia or other secondary cancers. And the risk of developing a second cancer after chemotherapy is influenced by factors like the type of chemotherapy drugs used, the dosage, the duration of treatment, and the individual’s overall health. ALL of this is to say that (IRONICALLY) chemotherapy also functions as a carcinogen, meaning that it is a cancer causing agent.
CANCER “TREATMENT” HAS FUELLED CORRUPTION IN THE MEDICAL INDUSTRY
Well, cancer so-called treatment has also fuelled corruption in the medical industry. For instance, chemotherapy is literal poison that destroys cells indiscriminately, with its consequences mostly being experimental – so much so that 97% of the time, chemotherapy actually does not work to kill cancerous cells – while destroying other cells in the body, and thus causing more harm to the patient! But, despite this, chemotherapy is almost always what is prescribed to patients with cancer. So, why would doctors do this – why would they prescribe an intervention that does not work 97% of the time?
Well, a doctor blew the whistle, and exposed that it is for one reason , and the reason is financial greed. In particular, he explains that if you go to a medical doctor, an MD, with a sinus infection, and that doctor prescribes an antibiotic, he gets no financial kickback. However, if he prescribes 5,000 products of that antibiotic in one month, the drug company that makes it might offer him an indirect remuneration, like sending him to a conference at a holiday destination. BUT, it is not this indirect with chemotherapeutic drugs. Chemotherapeutic drugs are the ONLY classification of drugs that the prescribing doctor gets a direct cut of. And so, if your doctor prescribes chemotherapy for you, he is able to get a monetary cut from the prescription. Here’s Dr Peter Glidden detailing this corruption.
This means Doctors literally have a financial incentive to prescribe chemotherapy to patients that do not have cancer. But, someone might say, that would be too drastic; at best doctors would perhaps just coerce patients who already have cancer to take chemotherapy. But, there is empirical evidence of the fact that this financial incentive for big pharma has motivated doctors to prescribe chemo to patients who did not have cancer, thus proving that the pharmaceutical industry is also culpable in creating doctors who kill.
AZT, AND THE CONCEALMENT OF EFFECTIVE CANCER TREATMENTS
This brings us to the drug AZT, because AZT and Anthony Fauci’s involvement reveal another degree of corruption related to cancer; in particular this is corruption relating to the concealment of treatments that are actually effective against cancer; and make no mistake, these treatments certainly exist! So, clinically called Zidovudine, but nicknamed AZT after its components, the drug AZT was said to have shown a dramatic effect on the survival of AIDS patients. But there were tremendous concerns about the new drug. It had actually been developed a quarter of a century earlier as a cancer chemotherapy, but was shelved and forgotten because it was so toxic, very expensive to produce, and totally ineffective against cancer. It was said to be powerful, but unspecific, meaning that the drug was not selective in its cell destruction. Well, Fauci pushed AZT, and it killed an estimated 330,000 people. AND, When doctors found effective treatments as a much safer and plausible alternative, well Fauci proceeded to silence them.
WHAT WE SEE WITH CANCER IS ALSO BEING DONE WITH “GENDER AFFIRMING CARE”
Now, perhaps this discussion on cancer seems a bit stretched because society has been conditioned to know that cancer has always been around and has always been deadly. It is almost inconceivable to think that people who died from cancer should not have died. Well, it is true. The fact that cancer has exploded in recent years is not a mistake that some happened to capitalise on to enrich themselves at the expense of others. This is obvious because the medical industrial complex does the same thing over and over again. So much so, that you can see the consistent threat in all they do – which is why even when it comes to gender affirming care, you can identify their role. Transgenderism was never a prevalent issue. As far back as 50 years ago, there simply were not many people claiming to be transgender and requiring gender affirming care. And then suddenly in the wake of LGBT rights, there was what can accurately be described as social contagion; transgenderism suddenly became topical – BUT, so was gender affirming care, which (surprise, surprise) is also a money making avenue.
THE SAME IS SEEN IN HOW THE MEDICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX MANIPULATED CHOLESTEROL
The same can be seen even in how the medical industrial complex manipulated the discourse or common consensus on cholesterol was before Statins entered the market, which was prior to 1987. Prior to statins, the normal total cholesterol level used to be 300. HOWEVER, big pharma moved the goalpost, and then suddenly statins became a sought after pharmaceutical product.