UK BMA Consultants Raise Concerns About Assisted Dying Bill

The BMA is the trade union and professional body for doctors and medical students in the UK and BMA Consultants have raised concerns about the Assisted Dying Bill. In fact, it was voted on and passed in the BMA consultant conference last week that “Assisted Dying is not a health activity and it must not take place in NHS or other health facilities. An assertion being made by some MPs is that assistance to end your life is just “another treatment option”. BMA consultants disagree. They say it presents ‘serious moral hazards to consultants’ and could have ‘serious potential adverse impacts’ on health services. The British House of Commons recently voted in favour of a bill allowing terminally ill adults in England and Wales to seek help to end their own life
Canada’s Fast Track to Death: Euthanasia Approved Years in Advance
Canada now leads the world in legalizing assisted suicide. Quebec has pushed things even further. A new law lets people apply for euthanasia in advance. They can do this even before their illness is in its final stages. Some patients may lose their ability to consent later. Quebec lets them pre-approve a lethal injection. This can happen months or years before it’s given. Canada is moving from universal healthcare to “universal deathcare.” This experiment raises serious questions. What starts as kindness can turn into something dangerous: convenience over care. Waiting lists for basic medical care are long in Canada. The state seems quicker to offer a lethal injection than a cure. Is this about dignity or saving money? The numbers may seem progressive. But a grim reality lies beneath the surface. It’s the devaluation of life, managed by bureaucracy. What if death becomes just another treatment option? A Canadian doctor shared a shocking story. Her patient was killed before doctors could help her. “Euthanasia was the only ‘care’ provided,” she said. “This is how it replaces normal medical care when it’s part of healthcare.” Some worry this could lead to more vulnerable people choosing death. They might feel like they’re a burden. Or they might not get the care they need to live.
Euthanasia is Eugenics
In Ontario, regulators have records of 428 possible legal problems. Yet, they haven’t sent even one case to the police. When Canada first allowed MAiD in 2016, it had rules. Only very sick people could get it. Doctors also had to follow steps before giving deadly drugs. Things changed in 2021. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government made it easier to get MAiD. Now, people who aren’t dying can get it. They only need to have a long-term illness. Imagine someone with arthritis choosing death. This is now possible in Canada. Some worry that the system isn’t safe. They think more people could easily be killed without proper oversight. The high number of potential legal violations raises serious questions. Is anyone watching to make sure people are not murdered? Euthanasia should be illegal everywhere.
The funding for euthanasia programs
Historically, one of the most infamous euthanasia programs was the Nazi T4 Program, initiated in 1939 under Adolf Hitler’s regime. This program, aimed at killing people with disabilities deemed “unworthy of life,” was overseen by the Führer Chancellery and funded through the Nazi government’s budget. Key figures like Philipp Bouhler and Karl Brandt directed the operation, with personnel paid from central offices in Berlin. In occupied territories, funding sometimes came from SS and police budgets. In modern contexts, euthanasia funding often ties to advocacy groups or legal frameworks rather than centralized programs. For instance, in the United States, federal funding is explicitly restricted from supporting euthanasia or assisted suicide under laws like the Assisted Suicide Funding Restriction Act of 1997. This means any such activities rely on private or state-level resources. Organizations like Death with Dignity, a prominent U.S.-based advocacy group, operate as nonprofits, funded through donations and grants. Their financials, including Form 990 filings, show support from individual donors and sometimes larger foundations, though specific names aren’t always public. Globally, right-to-die societies—over 80 worldwide, with around 60 in the World Federation of Right to Die Societies—rely on membership dues, private donations, and occasionally political lobbying funds. In countries where euthanasia is legal, like the Netherlands or Canada, costs are often integrated into healthcare systems, covered by public insurance or out-of-pocket payments, not separate “euthanasia funds.” Advocacy efforts, however, might still receive private backing from philanthropists or ideological groups pushing for expansion.
Proponents of Depopulation
For decades, powerful elites have openly discussed and promoted depopulation as a means to reshape society in their favor. From billionaires to policymakers, their words and actions reveal a disturbing agenda. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, during one of the World Economic Forum, stated that depopulation ACTUALLY GOOD as it makes it easier to replace humans with AI and automation.
US billionaire Bill Gates has grown an obsession over his vaccines. However, his vaccination programs in India have been linked to paralysis in at least 490,000 children. In a 2010 TED Talk, he controversially stated that vaccines could help reduce the global population by 10-15%.
For CNN founder Ted Turner, having 5 children does not stop him from saying that every family should only have 1 child. Throughout his life, Turned has donated millions to global population control programs, once stating that ‘we’re too many people, that’s why we have global warning. US billionaire David Rockefeller was a key figure in global depopulation initiatives, frequently calling for ‘population stabilization.’ In a 1994 speech, he warned: ‘The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.’ US Ex-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in The Kissinger Report (1970s) outlined U.S. efforts to reduce Africa’s population to control its resources. Kissinger and the Carter administration feared African nations developing and using their own resources.
UN ‘Messenger of Peace’ Jane Goodhall, during an interview, confessed that she would like to reduce the number of people on the planet. She has also spoken at the World Economic Forum as an ‘agenda contributor’, advocating for a staggering 95% reduction in the global population.
Written By Tatenda Belle Panashe