The Denial Of God And Divine Counsel In The WEF

Now onto our first question being: what is the perception of God in the WEF? The first and perhaps most important thing we learn about the WEF’s modus operandi is that it functions under the assumption that there is no God, and therefore no dive and sovereign Being who judges their decisions. Not only this, but the WEF champions ideas associated with the presence of anti-Christ spirits. On of the examples of the influence of the anti-Christ is the denial or plundering of private property and personal liberties like the freedom of speech. And in light of this, the WEF’s dispossession agenda encapsulated in the mantra “you will own nothing and be happy” exemplifies this. Furthermore, the WEF’s problematisation of God-given and inalienable freedoms like free speech further exemplifies the influence of the anti-Christ in its modus operandi. Most obvious example would be its dispossession agenda.
THE PREREQUISITE OF ANARCHY AND INSECURITY IN THE WEF’S OPERATIONS
This brings us to the second question being: what is the relationship between anarchy and insecurity and the WEF? Well, the WEF’s great reset agenda requires disorder or insecurity in order to flourish. It is based on the realist notion that nations exist in a state of insecurity without a central governing body that rules over them all; and therefore, the WEF tries constantly to highlight a state of anarchy and insecurity. This is why in January, they are constantly announcing issues of focus that are an urgent threat. Well, the announcements of issues of focus are not an end in themselves. In fact, together with the UN, they are culpable for creating problems, all to condition nations to accept their message of inherent anarchy and the need to cede their sovereignty. And this is how the UN has predominantly existed under Guterres. It is a satellite organisation of the WEF – essentially functioning with the same motive.
But, unfortunately, there are nations who’ve served as a case study for this modus operandi of the WEF to require anarchy and insecurity as prerequisites for their operations. Canada is one of them. Kindly watch this excerpt from a film titled ‘The Great Awakening’, where the connection is made between the downfall of Canada with the insidious agenda of the World Economic Forum. It especially highlights how nations like Canada are examples of the destructive effects of penetration of cabinets by the WEF, much like we saw during the covid planemic era.
THE ROLE OF DISPOSSESSION IN THE WEF’S AGENDA
And now onto our final question being: how has the WEF placed a dispossession agenda at the centre of its operations? The answer is that this is primarily driven by the WEF’s stakeholder capitalism. It entails that billionaire, globalist corporations will own everything—homes, factories, farms, cars, furniture—and everyday citizens will rent what they need, if their social credit score allows.
This dispossession agenda has actually been playing out in society in various circumstances – notably in how monetary organisations function, the manipulation of currency, and the weaponisation of foreign investment. Many of the stakeholders in global financial organisations and foreign investment, such as George Soros, are members of the Davos so-called elite.
But, when you consider the dispossession agenda, financial institutions like the IMF and WB are not necessarily just a tool for US foreign policy. The IMF and WB are a tool of the dispossession agenda in its entirety. And this is where we connect the dots. We began this series by discussing the influence of Henry Kissinger on Klaus Schwab. We detailed that while this influence was sparked by their shared connection through Harvard, it was primarily driven by Henry Kissinger’s large influence on American foreign policy. Well, the fact that global financial institutions, like the IMF and WB, have not only have served what looked like American foreign policy objectives, while really serving the dispossession agenda is not at all by happenstance. Nor is it a coincidence that what Klaus Schwab founded as the European Management Forum, changed its name to the World Economic Forum in 1987 – setting its ambition on global economic manipulation. Klaus Schwab’s dispossession agenda and WEF were as influenced by the unipolar world order established by the US’s foreign policy at the time, as was curated by Henry Kissinger. Schwab, appropriated this influence in Europe and then attempted to enshrine it on the world at large.
This is why the debate of nations is no mystery. This is also why the leaders of financial organisations and the individuals behind foreign investment are members of the Davos so-called elite.