The Responses to Biden’s Provocation of Russia

Biden and the cohort of diabolical actors that have been using his office to try to instigate a war that they would scapegoat on Russia, have tried to accelerate their efforts. Initially, this proxy war was a strategy towards preventing a Trump win but, their focus now is capitalising on Biden’s remaining time as president of the United States to accelerate the tensions and conflict; meaning that Trump would inherit the office of POTUS in the midst of a war; while the military industrial complex profits from the devastation. HOWEVER, their plans are not receiving the overwhelming support they perhaps thought they would enjoy (especially as a result of their propaganda); and so we have to talk about this  in light of the responses to Biden and co’s provocation of Russia.
U.S. PAUSES OPERATIONS AT KYIV EMBASSY, WARNING OF ‘SIGNIFICANT AIR ATTACK’
The United States shut its embassy in Kyiv on Wednesday due to specific information of a potential significant air attack and told its citizens in Ukraine to be ready to swiftly seek shelter. The Italian and Greek embassies said they had also closed their doors after the unusual US warning, while the French embassy remained open but urged its citizens to be cautious. On Tuesday, Ukraine used US ATACMS missiles to attack an arms depot inside Russia, making use of newly granted permission from the outgoing administration of US President Joe Biden on the 1,000th day of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The State Department Held a Briefing After Pausing US Embassy Operation In Kyiv.
Biden has allowed Ukraine to use US-made long-range weapons against Russia. And Ukraine officials stated recently that they have fired these missiles into Russia for the first time. In response, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has dropped the threshold for a nuclear strike in response to a broader range of conventional attacks, and Moscow said Kyiv had struck deep inside Russia with US-made ATACMS missiles. Putin authorised the reform days after two US officials and a source familiar with the decision said on Sunday that Biden’s administration permitted Ukraine to use US-made weapons to strike deep into Russia.
REPUBLICANS WANT TO IMPEACH BIDEN FOR THE PROVOCATION OF WAR
In the United States, the response (especially from Republicans) is that this conduct from Biden is either an intentional acceleration of the proxy war – in which case he must be impeached, or there is another coup and Biden does not know that the neocons in his administration have accelerated a war in his name.
BUT, in light of this development, you’d recall that we also discussed that Biden is discovering that the problem with being the face of an establishment is that you are disposable; because as the response from Americans and the world at large is condemnation for an accelerated war – Biden is the one facing impeachment, and not the neocons that have been curating this war before he even became president!
However, I added that Kamala Harris must ALSO be impeached. First, this is because she herself states that she has been extensively involved in the decisions of the Biden-Harris administration – which would make her culpable in this impeachable offence. Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, Kamala Harris is the preferred candidate for globalist figures and entities. There have been a number of reports warning about globalist figures wanting to prevent Trump and Vance from entering office (either by arrest or assassination), and giving the presidency to Kamala Harris. The context for this, is that globalist figures and big government in the US did not want a Trump administration because it is an impediment to their plans on multiple fronts: be it their plans on the vaccine holocaust, the war on free speech, systematised poisoning through food and flouride, and even the proxy war in Ukraine.
Therefore, not only did they unsuccessfully prevent the election or steal it from president Trump in November (because they cannot plan for the Church’s authority) – as I stated at the beginning of our discussion; but they are still trying to use their plans to prevent Trump from entering office – one key plan being the acceleration of the proxy war with Russia in Ukraine. AND SO, (once again) Kamala Harris must not be conveniently left out of the impeachment proceedings – because with Biden, those behind Harris are likely happy to get him out through impeachment, in a futile and nullified hope to set the stage for Harris to take the presidency next year. But, (once again) Biden certainly has found out that the problem with being the face of the establishment and globalist agenda is that you are disposable.
THEY ARE TRYING TO PAINT TRUMP AS A RUSSIAN PUPPET IN THIS PROXY WAR
So, with this context and recapitulation covered, it is worth noting that Alex Jones is not lying when he says there are also plans to scapegoat Trump as a Russian puppet in all of this. Which is really to emphasise that the devil has no creative ability: all he does is the same thing over and over just under slightly different circumstances, and you can discern his influence on people when you notice this. I say this because this is the same “Russia puppet” script they tried to use in the 2016 elections – that has even been debunked! But, this is how they are trying to re-use it, as articulated by the Director of Eurasia Democracy Initiative.
MEANWHILE, TRUMP IS DOUBLING DOWN ON CALLING FOR A PEACEFUL RESOLUTION
But, thankfully, president Trump is doubling down on his call for a peaceful resolution of this proxy war. He is adamant on calling for a cessation of fighting and acceleration; especially because these actions are not representative of the government and foreign policy that the American people have voted for.
PUTIN SAID HE’S OPEN TO A CEASEFIRE DISCUSSION IF TRUMP LEADS NEGOTIATIONS
Meanwhile, President Trump is looking more and more like the conduit through which this war can be prevented through peaceful negotiation, because in addition to Trump doubling down on his calls for peaceful resolution, Russian President Putin expressed that he is open to discussing a ceasefire with Ukraine, HOWEVER, IF negotiations are led by president Donald Trump. In addition to this Putin has ruled out any significant territorial concessions and demands that Ukraine abandon its NATO membership ambitions.
Which is not unreasonable at all! The territories in question contain Russian citizens who have had to bear the brunt of the flourishing of Nazi ideology in Ukraine, and systematised discrimination from the Ukrainian government since the ousting of Yanukovich! Furthermore, there were referendums held where the Donbas region democratically expressed the decision to secede from Ukraine and officially be a part of Russia – in fact, they asked Putin to intervene when the civil war between the Ukraine government and the region broke out. Secondly, the demand for Ukraine to abandon NATO membership ambitions is also reasonable; in fact, it is what NATO had agreed to decades ago, when it promised not to move an inch eastward from Germany – even though it proceeded to do so on multiple occasions, with Ukraine now being the final state that would enable NATO to surround Russia’s naval fleet in Sevastopol, Crimea with NATO states. So, Putin is not being unreasonable with these terms.
However, what is important to note is that he is capitalising on president Trump being the mediator of the negotiations for peace. This is important for three reasons. First, Trump has always promulgated a desire for a peacefully negotiated end to this proxy  war, because he sees this war not only as a financial liability to America (which is a key issue to eradicate in his America first agenda), but also a cause of needless loss of life and destruction that has even had ripple effects on the world at large. Secondly, Trump accurately sees this conflict as a proxy war, which means he recognises that NATO is a primary instigator that intended to actually fight Russia, and that Ukraine is an unfortunate casualty that is being used to fight this war (even though he recognises Zelensky’s wilful participation as a conman). But, finally, this is important because president Trump actually values having Russia in the negotiation – which is something NATO states have intentionally avoided because they wanted to prolong the war, despite Russia’s multiple offers for negotiation. So, really, this proclamation from Putin to be open to negotiations led by president Trump is the 6th time that Russia makes this offer to NATO and the West. And here’s a brief report on this development.
WORLD LEADER RESPOND TO UKRAINE’S USE OF U.S.-MADE MISSILES ON RUSSIAN TERRITORY
Now, a number of world leaders have responded to Biden sanctioning Ukraine to use US-made long-range missiles on Russian soil. And unfortunately, among them is UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer. He firstly calls Russia’s outlined threshold for nuclear strike “irresponsible rhetoric”, and says that Putin needs to end the war and get out of Ukraine.
There are two responses to this. First, this is proof that the conflict in Ukraine is unfortunately being driven by unreasonable leaders. Yesterday, we even listened to Jens Stoltenberg – the former Secretary General of NATO – bragging about NATO’s undermining of sensible diplomacy by not upholding their end of the bargain towards Russia. Secondly, Starmer’s remarks in particular echoe a dangerous dismissal of a situation they created; it is not irresponsible rhetoric what Putin communicated – what Putin expressed is the culmination of the West antagonising Putin – they are the reason he wants to aggressively defend against the use of missiles on his country – that were provided by a NATO member!
Now, this is not to say that nuclear war is in any way acceptable or ever commensurate as a response. In fact, on one of our programson LN24 International, called ‘Starting Point’ recently discussed the corrupt and implausible use of technology to develop some of the most destructive weapons in the history of humanity, including the atomic bombs – like the ones that were detonated in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This portion of history reveals how OVERWHELMING DESTRUCTIVE nuclear weapons are, which means they ought never to be an option – especially where humans are concerned.
BUT, thankfully, not all world leaders are echoing the same remarks as Keir Starmer. For instance, Italian Prime Minister Meloni expressed that Italy does not support Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to strike inside Russia. She also urged that the EU should work harder for a Ukraine ceasefire. The problem is the EU seems to echo a similar sentiment to NATO, while largely giving heed to Zelensky. In fact, Ukrainian President Zelensky addressed the EU Parliament on the 20th of November to mark over 1,000 days since Russia’s SMO in Ukraine, receiving a standing ovation for his misguided sentiments.
The subtext in Zelensky’s address is not a passionate call for comradery; it is a call to spend more money that nations should otherwise be spending on domestic and constructive affairs on a conflict that should not be taking place! Meanwhile, America has sent $75 BILLION to Ukraine since the war started. A little fraction of that could solve the homeless problem; in particular the amount spent by the US on the conflict in Ukraine would amount to an estimated 267,993 dollars for EACH individual homeless person in the USA.
But, thankfully, many world leaders are aware that this is a proxy war, driven by the West’s desire to defeat Russia and not to help Ukraine. In fact, even before Biden sanctioned the us of US-made missiles, the Serbian Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandar Vulin expressed that the West wants to defeat Russia, not support or help Ukraine; stating explicitly that the West does not want peace, they simply want to defeat Russia.
UKRAINE URGENTLY NEEDS AN ELECTION AND NEW LEADERSHIP 
But, in all of this, it truly is painful to think that a leader of a nation would sell out his own country to become a battle field for a proxy war instigated by the West. It is also painful to see that he would be so committed to this, that the would endanger the population of his country – not just in terms of the substantive consideration of the threats of war, but even the numerical consideration of the fact that Ukraine is an ageing nation with a relatively small population that cannot afford a prolonger war; this is why Zelensky’s government was even abducting men and children to make then fight in the war.
Therefore, in all of this, Ukraine urgently needs a peaceful resolution to this conflict, an election, and new leadership. Zelelnsky was an autocratic leader before the war started, and his oppressive inclinations (while simultaneously pretending to be the remaining bastion against so-called Russian aggression) have only become more apparent. Therefore, there is an urgent need to pray for the Church that is being persecuted under his administration, there is a need to pray for the children that are notoriously abducted and abused in his country; there is a need to pray for those forced into a war that should not be taking place, and the political opponents that he has been targeting.
Written by Lindokuhle Mabaso